Skip to content

apiMind vs Google Meet and Jitsi: Independent 2024 Benchmark Shows Our Advantages

apiMind vs Google MeetapiMind vs Jitsi

Transparency and Honesty — Our Approach to Growth

We believe real progress comes through open comparison with the best solutions on the market. That's why we commissioned independent testing from TestDevLab — a company with 10 years of experience and 500 specialists who test products used by 4.5 billion people worldwide.

apiMind's Key Victories

Leader in Extreme Network Conditions

When it comes to truly challenging connectivity conditions — high jitter and latency — apiMind demonstrates superiority:

  • +83% better FPS than Google Meet under high jitter/latency
  • +165% better FPS than Jitsi in the same conditions
  • Maintains video where Jitsi completely shuts it off

This is critical for users with unstable internet, working from remote locations, or relying on mobile connections.

Most Efficient Resource Usage

apiMind showed the lowest CPU and GPU consumption among all tested platforms. This means:

  • Extended battery life on laptops
  • Ability to run demanding applications simultaneously
  • Comfortable performance on mid-range devices

Stability Under Packet Loss

In packet loss scenarios (typical Wi-Fi network issues):

  • +48% better FPS than Jitsi
  • +33% better video quality (VMAF)
  • Minimal video freezing

Areas for Improvement: We're On It

We openly acknowledge areas that need work:

  1. Adaptation to extremely low bandwidth (200kbps) — Enhanced algorithm prioritizing audio over video already in development
  2. Quality recovery after network improvement — New dynamic adaptation mechanism coming Q1 2025

Year-Over-Year Progress: The Numbers Speak for Themselves

apiMind vs Google MeetapiMind vs Jitsi

Comparing to 2023 results, we've achieved:

  • Improved stability under packet loss
  • Enhanced video quality in challenging conditions
  • Reduced baseline audio delay
  • Optimized resource consumption

Why This Matters for Our Users

For Enterprise Clients

  • Reliability in critical conditions: When the CEO calls from an airport with poor Wi-Fi, apiMind keeps the connection alive
  • Resource efficiency: Less strain on corporate laptops = higher productivity

For Education

  • Works on lower-end devices: Students with budget laptops can comfortably participate in classes
  • Resilient to unstable networks: Rural schools with poor internet stay connected

For Remote Teams

  • Maximum accessibility: Work from anywhere in the world, even on mobile data
  • Extended sessions without overheating: Planning marathons and brainstorming sessions without technical issues

Our Approach: Focus on Real-World Scenarios

Unlike competitors, we optimize apiMind for real, not ideal conditions:

  • Google Meet works great with good internet, but how many of us always have perfect connectivity?
  • Jitsi simply disables video when problems arise — we believe showing lower quality video is better than showing none
  • apiMind is built for the real world — where networks are unstable, devices are diverse, and communication is critical

What's Next?

We're not stopping here. Our 2025 roadmap includes:

  1. AI-powered Network Adaptation — Machine learning to predict and preempt network issues
  2. Selective Forward Unit (SFU) 2.0 — Revolutionary architecture for scaling to 1000+ participants
  3. Edge Computing Integration — Reduced latency through distributed infrastructure

Experience the Difference Yourself

Data tells a story, but your own experience writes the final chapter. Don't just take our word for it:

Conclusion

The independent benchmark confirmed: apiMind isn't just "another video calling platform." It's a solution built for the real world where:

  • Networks are imperfect
  • Devices are diverse
  • But communication must always work

We're not perfect, but we're honest. We know our strengths and openly work on improvements. Most importantly — we're optimized for your real working conditions, not laboratory tests.


Research conducted by TestDevLab (Latvia) in July 2024. Methodology: 3 participants, Windows/Chrome, testing under changing bandwidth conditions (Unlimited→2M→500K→200K), packet loss (0→10%→20%), and jitter/latency (0/0→100/30→500/90→1500/270ms).


#apiMind #VideoConferencing #Benchmarking #RemoteWork #TechInnovation

← Back to the blog